employee
Donetsk, Russian Federation
UDC 316
The author considers the impact of globalization processes on the formation of universal (common to humanity) values. The conclusion is formulated that modern civilization is experiencing a crisis of basic values, while, on the one hand, values are changing in response to globalization processes, on the other hand, established values a ect the prospects of globalization. It is noted that the most profound transformation of value systems can be clearly traced in individual countries and regions that, being engulfed by social and political upheavals, are experiencing an identity crisis. Based on a comparative analysis of global universal and traditional values of Russian society, it has been demonstrated that the formation of universal values common to humanity is possible in the context of one’s own national history; global solidarity of citizens is possible when cultural and value orientations are closely intertwined with the principles of global justice, on the one hand, and national cultural heritage, on the other.
globalization, culture, civilization, universal values, traditional values, value orientations, value systems
1. Harichev A., Shutov A., Polosin A., Sokolova E. “Reception of Basic Values, Factors and Structures [of] Socio-Historical Development of Russia (Based on Research and Testing Materials). Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovaniy = Journal of Political Research 6.3 (2022): 9—19. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2022-6-3-9-19
2. Gubman B. L. 20th Century Occidental Philosophy of Culture: study guide for universities. Tver: LEAN, 1997. 287 p. (In Russian).
3. Gumilev Lev N. Rhythms of Eurasia: Epochs and Civilizations. St. Petersburg: Kristall; Moscow: Oniks, 2003. 608 p. (In Russian). Vekhi istorii.
4. Gumilev Lev N. Ethnogenesis and Biosphere of Earth. Transl. from Russian. Moscow: Progress, [1990]. 382 p., ill.
5. Dianova V. M. “Cultural Pluralism under Conditions of Globalization”. Rossiya i Gruziya: dialog i rodstvo kul’tur: sb. materialov simpoziuma (Tbilisi, 3—6 sent. 2003). Iss. 1. St. Petersburg: S.-Peterb. filos. ob-vo, 2003. 93—103. (In Russian).
6. Ivin A. A. Philosophy of History: study guide for university students of the humanities. Moscow: Gardariki, 2000. 525 p., ill. (In Russian). Disciplinae: D.
7. Kalandiya I. D. “System of Universal Values During Runtime and in Dialogue of Civilizations under Conditions of Globalization”. Chelovek: sootnosheniye natsional’nogo i obshchechelovecheskogo: sb. materialov Mezhdunar. Simpoziuma (g. Zugdidi, Gruziya, 19—20 maya 2004 g.). Ed. V. V. Partsvaniya. Iss. 2. St. Petersburg: S.-Peterb. filos. ob-vo, 2004. 111—123. (In Russian).
8. Levi-Strauss Claude. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1974. 410 p.
9. Lipkin A. I. “ ‘Spiritual Core’ of Civilizational Entity”. Sintez tsivilizatsii i kul’tury: international almanac. Publ. eds Yu. Pivovarov, T. Timofeyev, N. Shmelev. Iss. 2. Moscow: INION RAN; In-t Evropy RAN; Tsentr mezhtsivilizats. issled., 2004. 307—337. (In Russian).
10. Lukasheva E. A. “Law and Culture in Contemporary World”. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law 5 (2012): 26—42. (In Russian).
11. Semenov Yu. I. Philosophy of History: General Theory, Main Problems, Ideas and Concepts from Ancient Times to the Present Day. Moscow: Sovrem. tetradi, 2003. 775 p. (In Russian). Nauchnaya biblioteka “Sovremennykh tetradey”. Filosofiya.
12. Toynbee Arnold J. A Study of History. Ed. D. C. Somervell. New abridg. ed. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1987.
13. Fadeeva T. M. “United Europe: Heritage and Destiny”. Voprosy filosofii 4 (1992): 108—117. (In Russian).
14. Febvre Lucien. Combats pour l’histoire. Paris: A. Colin, 1953. 458 p. (In French).
15. Yakovets Yu. V. Globalization and Interaction of Civilizations. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2001. 345 p., chart. (In Russian).
